TeddyTwo

Quote from Ccrane9 >> according to ROOT, the highest level event has a 5% chance of players and banners The lowest level has a 4% chance of players and banners Level 2 has 4.25% chance Level 3 has 4.25% chance Level 4 has 4.5% chance.   Bottom line, you're going to have a hard time seeing a difference if there is only a 1% difference between the 5.   So if you play the event 100 times, you'll see one more player and banner (on average) for level 5 vs level 1 LMAO

If it doesn't contain banners its useless. Even spamming events is useless

Looks like he has 4 arms at first glance

I would be fine if they doubled the requirements for the banner trade in set and removed the cool down. Honestly even triple it, I don’t care. As long as I can do it as many times as I want.

Quote from alnamiasiv >> Quote from layd2rest >> You are looking at the build all wrong. Same archtype but Franco is more of a runner who can block. Like Jim Brown. Franco wins in every single general attribute and all ball carrier attributes except the blocking ones and CIT.  Which is fine and well in 1975, but in modern playbooks, and specifically all of EA’s playbooks, how often does the FB touch the ball as a runner? As a pass catcher okay, but as a runner? Not very often. His primary purpose is to block and this is esp true out of the SM scheme. Therefore, for EA to make Harris a runner who can block, esp out of the SM scheme, shows a general ignorance of the scheme and the needs of the people who use the scheme.

Ahh. I knew that it sounded like it would be way too fun

Quote from Schmooyohoo >> As far as limited cards and having interesting off season players to pull in pro/ gem packs, does having TOTY and other players pullable in pro packs make y'all excited we'll get more rare cards pullable again for F2P players?  It would be nice

Quote from MaddenPimp >> Quote from TeddyTwo >> Quote from gohogsgo71

Quote from gohogsgo71 >> Quote from ncbeach20 >> So EA made more money when Chinese coins were available... interesting. The overall player numbers were substantially higher, so that would make sense.  No different than cable television companies with gouging prices hunting down people with scrambled boxes that watch a fuzzy picture of Cinemax After Dark (ahem), but that instead drove people to other options and put many of them out of business whereas overall number of viewers is a higher value metric that profit per unit, as proven by models like youtube, etc.

Quote from Bouncer014 >> Quote from starkmm >> Quote from Bouncer014